Log in / Create free account🌐 ES☀️

← Basic training · Module 8 — Beginner mistakes — real anonymised cases

Mistakes with Display, PMax and automated campaigns: the money that leaks out unseen

⏱️ 10 min read · 🖼️ Display ⚙️ Performance Max 🛡️ Fraud · updated on 2026-08-22

🎧 Listen to the lesson · ≈ 6 min🔒 Subscribers only

Automated campaigns (Display with broad targeting, Performance Max, Demand Gen) promise results without effort. Sometimes they deliver. But they share one feature that makes them dangerous for beginners: they spend in places you cannot see. These are the mistakes we have seen lose the most money, and they are among the hardest to discover because aggregate reports hide them.

Mistake 1 · Site farms

Case: a services company's Display campaign with 8,000 clicks a month at €0.04 each. Conversion rate: 0%. The placement report showed hundreds of domains with generic names, copied content and dozens of ads per page; several shared the same IP and the same publisher ID. They were farms: websites built to charge for impressions and clicks, often with non-human traffic. The same network of farms turned up in three other clients' accounts.

How to spot it: the "Where ads showed" report sorted by clicks: a laughable CPC, an anomalous CTR, zero conversions, domains you do not recognise. Visit them: if the site makes no sense, it is a farm.

How to fix it: exclude placements (at account level, which also applies to PMax) and, better still, do not target Display "at everybody": specific audiences, excluded content categories, and a weekly placement review. It is never-ending work: farms create new domains every week.

Mistake 2 · Gaming apps (and children's clicks)

Case: a B2B lead generation campaign with 60% of its Display spend going to mobile apps — free children's games, torch apps, wallpaper apps. Accidental clicks on an ad for business management software. Zero leads.

How to spot it: a placement report with "mobileapp::" rows or app names; segment by device (disproportionately mobile) and by placement type.

How to fix it: exclude the app categories or, in many businesses, all apps (an app placement exclusion at campaign or account level). App inventory is legitimate for promoting apps and not much else.

Mistake 3 · PMax cannibalising the brand

Case: an ecommerce launched Performance Max and its ROAS "rose" to 9. At the same time the brand Search campaign lost 60% of its conversions. PMax had claimed the brand searches, which used to convert just as well and cost less. The account's total ROAS had not changed; only how it was split in the report.

How to spot it: the brand campaign dropping at the same time PMax launched; PMax search terms containing your name.

How to fix it: brand exclusions in PMax (a campaign setting), and judge PMax by the total incremental gain for the account, not by its own ROAS.

Mistake 4 · View-through conversions and "all conversions"

Case: a Display report boasting "300 conversions a month". They were view-through conversions: people who saw (did not click) a banner and bought later through some other channel. Measuring only click conversions: 6.

How to fix it: judge Display and video with click conversions and, if you do use view-through ones, with very short windows and knowing they are only indicative. And never in the headline column of a report for the board.

Mistake 5 · Trusting the automatic without watching it

The common thread through the previous four. "Automatic" does not mean "unsupervised": it means Google decides within the limits you set, and that if you do not set limits, Google's own interest sets them (more reach, more spend). Placement and brand exclusions, app exclusion lists, clean conversions and reviewing placement reports are the minimum limits.

The five-minute audit

  1. Display/PMax placement report by clicks: do you recognise the domains? → Mistake 1.
  2. Are there apps in the placements? → Mistake 2.
  3. Did brand drop when PMax launched? Are brand exclusions in place? → Mistake 3.
  4. Which conversion column does the Display report use? → Mistake 4.

💡 Ninja trick: these mistakes are the reason Ninja Shield exists. Every night it analyses the sites and apps where your ads show (content, ad density, trust signals such as a CMP, a trust seal or a company tax ID, domain age, shared IP and publisher), detects the farms as networks — when one domain falls, its siblings fall with it, even if they have not yet spent a single euro in your account — and excludes them at account level, where PMax respects it. What a manager cannot review by hand every week, the script reviews every day.

What you should remember

📝 Lesson quiz

Create your free account to take the quiz and save your score.

📎 Sources and further reading

💡 Suggest new content

⚠️ Free training with no support. Ninja Scripts support channels (email and Telegram) are only for the use of the scripts, not for Google Ads questions or questions about this training.
🎓
You're reading the Basic training in the open

Create your free account (no card) to save your progress, take the graded quizzes, earn the Basic level certificate and unlock part of the Intermediate and Advanced training.

Create my free account →
🥷

Subscriber feature

This option is part of the Ninja Scripts Suite subscription.

See the subscription →